This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Generally, the age when very little is completely missing from the linguistic competence of ... (Read 89 times)

mmm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
Generally, the age when very little is completely missing from the linguistic competence of children, or when language acquisition is completed, is:
 
  A. Two years old.
  B. Three years old.
  C. Five years old.
  D. Ten years old.

Question 2

A chronological view of child language development demonstrates that children learn language in the following stages:
 
  A. All at once.
  B. Syllables sounds, grammar and communicative competence.
  C. Phonology, vocabulary, grammar.
  D. None of these answers are true.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ryansturges

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

D




mmm

  • Member
  • Posts: 558
Reply 2 on: Jun 22, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


matt95

  • Member
  • Posts: 317
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

To combat osteoporosis, changes in lifestyle and diet are recommended. At-risk patients should include 1,200 to 1,500 mg of calcium daily either via dietary means or with supplements.

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions may make getting pregnant impossible.

Did you know?

Not getting enough sleep can greatly weaken the immune system. Lack of sleep makes you more likely to catch a cold, or more difficult to fight off an infection.

Did you know?

There are over 65,000 known species of protozoa. About 10,000 species are parasitic.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library