Author Question: Children are able to draw logically correct conclusions in problems with two true premises, but ... (Read 1316 times)

elizabeth18

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 559
Children are able to draw logically correct conclusions in problems with two true premises, but adolescents are able to draw logically correct conclusions in problems with ___________________ __premises.
 
  a. verbal
  b. counterfactual
  c. counterfeit
  d. unreasonable

Question 2

Bill is larger than Charles. Charles is larger than a house. Therefore, Bill is larger than a house. This is an example of
 
  a. metacognitive understanding.
  b. mastery goal orientation.
  c. coordination of theory with evidence.
  d. a syllogism.



itsakadoozi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 317
Answer to Question 1

Answer: b. counterfactual

Answer to Question 2

Answer: d. a syllogism.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The people with the highest levels of LDL are Mexican American males and non-Hispanic black females.

Did you know?

Nitroglycerin is used to alleviate various heart-related conditions, and it is also the chief component of dynamite (but mixed in a solid clay base to stabilize it).

Did you know?

Inotropic therapy does not have a role in the treatment of most heart failure patients. These drugs can make patients feel and function better but usually do not lengthen the predicted length of their lives.

Did you know?

Vampire bats have a natural anticoagulant in their saliva that permits continuous bleeding after they painlessly open a wound with their incisors. This capillary blood does not cause any significant blood loss to their victims.

Did you know?

Approximately 25% of all reported medication errors result from some kind of name confusion.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library