This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The difference between passive and active listening is the level of the listener's involvement. ... (Read 157 times)

RODY.ELKHALIL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 591
The difference between passive and active listening is the level of the listener's involvement.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Haptic communication is not status-driven.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ebe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
Answer to Question 1

TRUE
There are two types of listening: passive and active. The difference between them is the level
of the listener's involvement.

Answer to Question 2

FALSE
Haptic communication is status-driven. That is, a manager may give an employee an
encouraging pat on the back, but not vice versa.




RODY.ELKHALIL

  • Member
  • Posts: 591
Reply 2 on: Jun 23, 2018
Wow, this really help


jordangronback

  • Member
  • Posts: 339
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

When intravenous medications are involved in adverse drug events, their harmful effects may occur more rapidly, and be more severe than errors with oral medications. This is due to the direct administration into the bloodstream.

Did you know?

Colchicine is a highly poisonous alkaloid originally extracted from a type of saffron plant that is used mainly to treat gout.

Did you know?

The B-complex vitamins and vitamin C are not stored in the body and must be replaced each day.

Did you know?

Elderly adults are at greatest risk of stroke and myocardial infarction and have the most to gain from prophylaxis. Patients ages 60 to 80 years with blood pressures above 160/90 mm Hg should benefit from antihypertensive treatment.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library