This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The sign test for comparing paired samples assumes that the measurement scale of the sample data is: ... (Read 102 times)

abarnes

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
The sign test for comparing paired samples assumes that the measurement scale of the sample data is:
 a. nominal.
  b. ordinal.
  c. interval.
  d. ratio.
  e. Any measurement scale can be used for the sign test for comparing paired samples.

Question 2

A nonparametric method to compare two or more populations, when the samples are matched pairs and the data are either ranked or quantitative but not normal is the:
 a. Wilcoxon signed rank test.
  b. Wilcoxon rank sum test.
  c. Friedman test.
  d. Kruskal-Wallis test.
  e. Sign test for comparing paired samples.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

BUTTHOL369

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

C





 

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions cause a higher risk of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Did you know?

The average older adult in the United States takes five prescription drugs per day. Half of these drugs contain a sedative. Alcohol should therefore be avoided by most senior citizens because of the dangerous interactions between alcohol and sedatives.

Did you know?

The liver is the only organ that has the ability to regenerate itself after certain types of damage. As much as 25% of the liver can be removed, and it will still regenerate back to its original shape and size. However, the liver cannot regenerate after severe damage caused by alcohol.

Did you know?

Only one in 10 cancer deaths is caused by the primary tumor. The vast majority of cancer mortality is caused by cells breaking away from the main tumor and metastasizing to other parts of the body, such as the brain, bones, or liver.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library