This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: An outlier in a data set may have a simple explanation such as a scale was not working properly or ... (Read 65 times)

BrownTown3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
An outlier in a data set may have a simple explanation such as a scale was not working properly or the researcher inverted the digits of a number when recording a measurement.
 
  A) True B) False

Question 2

An alarm company reports that the number of alarms sent to their monitoring center from customers owning their system follow a Poisson distribution with  = 4.6 alarms per year. Find the probability that a randomly selected customer had more than 7 alarms reported.
 
  A) 0.095 B) 0.905 C) 0.182 D) 0.818 E) 0.087



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

raili21

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

A




BrownTown3

  • Member
  • Posts: 564
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


momolu

  • Member
  • Posts: 320
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

Drug-induced pharmacodynamic effects manifested in older adults include drug-induced renal toxicity, which can be a major factor when these adults are experiencing other kidney problems.

Did you know?

All adults should have their cholesterol levels checked once every 5 years. During 2009–2010, 69.4% of Americans age 20 and older reported having their cholesterol checked within the last five years.

Did you know?

In 1835 it was discovered that a disease of silkworms known as muscardine could be transferred from one silkworm to another, and was caused by a fungus.

Did you know?

The largest baby ever born weighed more than 23 pounds but died just 11 hours after his birth in 1879. The largest surviving baby was born in October 2009 in Sumatra, Indonesia, and weighed an astounding 19.2 pounds at birth.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library