This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following is not an indicator of multicollinearity? A) Regression coefficients do ... (Read 202 times)

jenna1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Which of the following is not an indicator of multicollinearity?
 
  A) Regression coefficients do differ considerably from values indicated by theory or experience including having incorrect signs.
  B) Coefficients of variables believed to be a strong influence have small Student's t statistics indicating that their values do not differ from 0.
  C) All the coefficient student t statistics are small, indicating no individual effect.
  D) High correlations between individual independent variables.

Question 2

The central limit theorem states that if all possible random samples of size n are taken from any population, the sampling distribution of sample means becomes approximately normal when the sample size n is large enough.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

wuly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

TRUE




jenna1

  • Member
  • Posts: 568
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


Dnite

  • Member
  • Posts: 297
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

The average adult has about 21 square feet of skin.

Did you know?

In 1835 it was discovered that a disease of silkworms known as muscardine could be transferred from one silkworm to another, and was caused by a fungus.

Did you know?

People with alcoholism are at a much greater risk of malnutrition than are other people and usually exhibit low levels of most vitamins (especially folic acid). This is because alcohol often takes the place of 50% of their daily intake of calories, with little nutritional value contained in it.

Did you know?

There are 20 feet of blood vessels in each square inch of human skin.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library