Author Question: As a result of the Griggs decision, may employers insist that both minority and white job applicants ... (Read 57 times)

hbsimmons88 · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

As a result of the Griggs decision, may employers insist that both minority and white job applicants meet the applicable job qualifications by the use of testing or measuring procedures?

Question 2

Which of the following statements about Sarbanes-Oxley is not true?
a. All accounting firms that audit public companies must register with the PCAOB.
b. Auditors must report to the CEO of the company they are auditing.
c. Auditing firms cannot base their employees' compensation on sales of consulting services to clients.
d. An accounting firm cannot audit a company if one of the client's top officers has worked for that firm within the prior year and was involved in the company's audit.
e. Every five years, the lead audit partner must rotate off an audit account.

Carliemb17 · **Reply #1 on:** Jun 24, 2018

Answer to Question 1

Yes. Nothing in the Griggs decision or the Act precludes the use of testing or measuring procedures. The Court says that obviously the procedures are useful. They must, however, demonstrably be pertinent as a reasonable measure of job performance. Congress has not commanded that the less qualified be preferred over the better qualified simply because of minority origins but rather that any test used measure the person for the job and not the person in the abstract.

Answer to Question 2

.B