Comment on Wedtech's concern that the employees would select a ...

[lracut11]

Comment on Wedtech's concern that the employees would select a union that would engage in arm's-length bargaining.

Question 2

The possessor of a piece of order paper does not have an unconditional right to be paid if:
 a. The paper is negotiable.
  b. The possessor is the payee.
  c. The paper has been indorsed to the possessor.
  d. The possessor is a holder in due course.
  e. The issuer changed his mind after signing the instrument.

[nikmaaacs]

Answer to Question 1

The employer's concern about facing arm's-length bargaining indicates an unethical corporate attitude. Obtaining a viable collective bargaining agreement in 1983 for a 25,000 payment and the making of monthly payments of 5,000 to both Stolfi and Casalino were egregious wrongs by the employer and by the union officials. The losers in such a corrupt arrangement were the workers.

Answer to Question 2

.B

[lracut11]

Thank you

[nikmaaacs]

Happy to help you