Author Question: Is compulsory arbitration constitutional?[br][br][b][color=gray]Question 2[/color][/b][br][br]Louise ... (Read 64 times)

Caiter2013 · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

Is compulsory arbitration constitutional?

Question 2

Louise e-mails Sonya, I will sell you my house at 129 Brittle Blvd. for 88,000, payable in one month. Best, Louise.. Sonya e-mails back, Louise, I accept the offer to buy your house at that price. Sonya.. Neither party prints a copy of the two e-mails.
a. The parties have a binding contract for the sale of Louise's house.
b. Louise is bound by the agreement but Sonya is not.
c. Sonya is bound by the agreement but Louise is not.
d. Neither party is bound because the agreement was never put in writing.
e. Neither party is bound because the agreement was never signed.
e. An adhesion contract

nixon_s · **Reply #1 on:** Jun 24, 2018

Answer to Question 1

We don't know if compulsory arbitration is constitutional. The LMRA does not require compulsory arbitration since ultimately the right of unions to call strikes is preserved even in the case of a strike that is deemed a national emergency.

Answer to Question 2

.A