Answer to Question 1
No. The dissent states that the Court in Babcock recognized that actual communication with non-employee organizers, not mere notice that an organizing drive exists, is necessary to vindicate Section 7 rights. If employees are entitled to learn the advantages of self-organization, holding up signs from the grassy strip by the highway is not sufficient access.
Answer to Question 2
The Supreme Court found that they did have reasonable access to the employees. It points out that signs displayed from the public grassy strip adjoining the parking lot would have informed the employees about the union's organizational efforts.
When Union troops pushed toward Richmond in June of 1862, these slaves crossed the Rappahannock Rive
This photograph of a Union soldier just freed from Andersonville prison, stunned and enraged norther
A mound of buffalo skulls. In 1870 an estimated 30 million buffalo roamed the plains; by 1900 there
In 1885 masked Nebraskans seeking access to water posed for photographer S. D. Butcher, who captione
Controlling access to water in order to gain political and strategic advantage in Gaza
Access to clean drinking water is just as important as adequate nutrition for human health