Answer to Question 1
The state said that the purpose of the statute was to protect the community from violence attendant upon picketing pressure, that it was a proper exercise of police power, and, finally, that the Section applied only to the scene of labor dispute.
The Court rejected these contentions on the following grounds:
(a) Picketing presents no clear and present danger to property or persons.
(b) The streets are proper places for dissemination of information, and one is not to have the exercise of his liberty of expression in appropriate places abridged on the plea that it may be exercised in some other place.
Answer to Question 2
Yes. The Supreme Court held Section 3448 invalid as preventing free communication.
The Scopes Trial: William Jennings Bryan (right) represented the state of Tennessee, and Clarence Da
An aryballe vase or decanter made for carrying body oils clearly demonstrates that ancient Greeks we
Listening to Normal Speech or Its Prosodic Components Functional MRI scans were made while subjects
This chart illustrates the four quadrants in which we can place the relationships between the state
Made over Made better
Percentage of Americans Living in Communities with a Fluoridated Water Supply, by State. 2012