According to the General Counsel's position, why was Mr. Santillo ...

[MGLQZ]

According to the General Counsel's position, why was Mr. Santillo fired by his employer?

Question 2

Did the dissent believe that the parties did more than establish a procedural framework, and negotiated a substantive contract provisions with a minority union, contrary to the Board's Majestic Weaving precedent? Identify some substantive provisions, if any.

[jojobee318]

Answer to Question 1

The General Counsel's position was that Mr. Santillo was fired because of his union activity in distributing authorization cards to fellow employees.

Answer to Question 2

Yes. Dissenting member Hayes said the LOA was a contract that did more than establish a procedural framework for future negotiations. The parties agreed on the duration of future CBAs, interest arbitration procedures, and a waiver of strike activity in advance of any final contract.