This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following is not subject to mandatory bargaining? a. drug testing b. retirement plans ... (Read 135 times)

craiczarry

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Which of the following is not subject to mandatory bargaining?
 a. drug testing
  b. retirement plans c. holidays
  d. no-strike clauses
  e. all are subject to mandatory bargaining

Question 2

In 1999, the Drugs-R-Us began testing its new drug, Reduceo, a medicine to help people lose weight. Tests looked promising and, in 2006, the company applied to the FDA for approval to market Reduceo as a prescription drug. In March 2009, the FDA granted Drug-R-Us approval to market Reduceo. Reduceo was sold with some diet enhancing cookies that contained no drugs but were claimed to help dieting with Reduceo. Frank saw an ad for the new drug. The Reduceo ad stated that it was a wonder drug and tests prove it is the safest weight reduction drug on the market today Frank was interested and made an appointment to see his doctor. Frank's physician prescribed the new drug for his patient. Frank had no success using other weight-loss drugs, and dieting and exercise seemed ineffective. Frank took Reduceo from June until the end of August and lost 25 lbs. He also ate Reduceo's cookies. He was delighted with his weight loss, but was concerned because dots appeared before his eyes, causing disorientation. One day, the dots appeared before Frank's eyes while he was driving. He became disoriented and hit a tree and was seriously injured. He sued Drugs-R-Us, alleging negligence in manufacturing and inadequate warning of possible effects, as well as for deceptive advertising. If it turns out that Frank had a vision problem before he started taking Reduceo, and the instructions with the drug told doctors not to prescribe it in such cases, Drugs-R-Us:
 a. would still be likely to be liable to Frank for his injuries as strict liability applies
  b. would still be liable to Frank for his injuries if it could be shown that the firm was negligent in the way it prepared the warning statement
  c. would probably not be liable due to the learned intermediary doctrine
  d. would not be liable due to FDA approval which shields the drug maker e. none of the other choices



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

bd5255

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Answer to Question 1

e

Answer to Question 2

c




craiczarry

  • Member
  • Posts: 527
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Excellent


nanny

  • Member
  • Posts: 313
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

A good example of polar molecules can be understood when trying to make a cake. If water and oil are required, they will not mix together. If you put them into a measuring cup, the oil will rise to the top while the water remains on the bottom.

Did you know?

Parkinson's disease is both chronic and progressive. This means that it persists over a long period of time and that its symptoms grow worse over time.

Did you know?

According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, lung disease is the third leading killer in the United States, responsible for one in seven deaths. It is the leading cause of death among infants under the age of one year.

Did you know?

To prove that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and not by stress, a researcher consumed an entire laboratory beaker full of bacterial culture. After this, he did indeed develop stomach ulcers, and won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.

Did you know?

The heart is located in the center of the chest, with part of it tipped slightly so that it taps against the left side of the chest.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library