Author Question: Liquidated Damages versus Penalties. Every homeowner in the Putnam County, Indiana, subdivision of ... (Read 71 times)

karlynnae · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

Liquidated Damages versus Penalties. Every homeowner in the Putnam County, Indiana, subdivision of Stardust Hills must be a member of the Stardust Hills Owners Association, Inc, and must pay annual dues of 200 for the maintenance of common areas and other community services. Under the association's rules, dues paid more than ten days late shall bear a delinquent fee at a rate of 2.00 per day. Phyllis Gaddis owned a Stardust Hills lot on which she failed to pay the dues. Late fees began to accrue. Nearly two months later, the association filed a suit in an Indiana state court to collect the unpaid dues and the late fees. Gaddis argued in response that the delinquent fee was an unenforceable penalty. What questions should be considered in determining the status of this fee? Should the association's rule regarding assessment of the fee be enforced? Explain.

Question 2

In Bearden v. Wardley Corp, where Gritton's real estate agent cheated her in a deal, the court held that Wardley, Gritton's employer, violated its ______ to Bearden:
a. duty to inform
b. duty of performance c. duty to account
d. duty of obedience
e. none of the other choices; Wardley was not responsible

livaneabi · **Reply #1 on:** Jun 24, 2018

Answer to Question 1

Liquidated damages v. penalties
The court entered a judgment against Gaddis for the amount of the unpaid dues, plus 58 in late fees. Gaddis appealed to a state intermediate appellate court, which affirmed the lower court's judgment. The appellate court observed, The provision at issue here, which provides for a flat rate of two dollars per day when the annual dues are not paid on time, regardless of proof of damages, clearly fits within the definition of liquidated damages. Gaddis asserts that the Association's actual loss from the late payment can be gauged by what interest rate it might receive by placing the money in an interest-bearing account. She therefore contends that the fee of two dollars per day is so obviously disproportionate to this amount, the failure of the court to declare it a penalty was a blatantly obvious error.' However, the costs of enforcing the payment of the annual dues can be high and are directly related to the two-dollar per day fee. Thus, the sum sought by this liquidated damages clause is not grossly disproportionate to the loss that may result from a breach of contract.

Answer to Question 2

e