Texaco sold gas to some gas stations for less than it sold gas to ...

[chandani]

Texaco sold gas to some gas stations for less than it sold gas to Hasbrouck, who sued. You would expect that the Supreme Court held Texaco had:
 a. not violated any antitrust law because it sold the product for less to large volume chains less, which met the cost justification defense
  b. not violated any antitrust law because it sold the product for less in order to meet competition that offered the same price to the chains
  c. violated the rule against resale price maintenance
  d. boycotted Hasbrouck by making him pay a higher price e. engaged in illegal price discrimination against Hasbrouck

Question 2

The awarding of back pay is not a remedy under Title VII.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

[Carliemb17]

Answer to Question 1

e

Answer to Question 2

FALSE

[chandani]

Thank you

[Carliemb17]

Happy to help you