In Eastman Kodak v. Image Technical Services, Kodak was charged with tying the sale of service of their copiers and other equipment to the sale of parts. The Supreme Court ruled:
a. no tying arrangement existed because the markets for service and sale of parts overlapped b. no tying arrangement was proved to have existed, so there could be no antitrust illegality
c. a tying arrangement existed, but Kodak held a small share of the market for service and parts, so rule of reason analysis allowed the arrangement to stand
d. no tying arrangement existed because independent service organizations could purchase Kodak parts fromKodak whenever they so desired e. none of the other choices
Question 2
If the EEOC, responding to a complaint, does not file a discrimination suit, the employee has lost the chance to have the matter considered in court.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Brumbies awaiting their sale and new homes.
3D image of a melanoma cell
Electron Microscope Image of a Fly Foot
image
Example of Health Care Services
Washing hands and removing jewelry are two important safety habits all service technicians ...