Author Question: In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that ... (Read 135 times)

debasdf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that would not follow its pricing policy (resale price maintenance). The Supreme Court held that:
 a. resale price maintenance is always illegal as stated in Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons
  b. resale price maintenance can help promote intrabrand competition, which is the primary purpose of the antitrust laws
  c. vertical price fixing can help promote intrabrand competition, which is the primary purpose of the antitrust laws
  d. resale price maintenance can help promote interbrand competition, which is the primary purpose of the antitrust laws
  e. horizontal price fixing can help promote interbrand competition, which is the primary purpose of the antitrust laws

Question 2

There are basically two types of sexual harassment: quid pro quo and aggravated.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



spencer.martell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 342
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

FALSE



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Elderly adults are living longer, and causes of death are shifting. At the same time, autopsy rates are at or near their lowest in history.

Did you know?

Patients should never assume they are being given the appropriate drugs. They should make sure they know which drugs are being prescribed, and always double-check that the drugs received match the prescription.

Did you know?

In women, pharmacodynamic differences include increased sensitivity to (and increased effectiveness of) beta-blockers, opioids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and typical antipsychotics.

Did you know?

Increased intake of vitamin D has been shown to reduce fractures up to 25% in older people.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library