In U.S. v. United States Gypsum, regarding sharing of price ...

[oliviahorn72]

In U.S. v. United States Gypsum, regarding sharing of price information by gypsum makers, the Supreme Court held that:
 a. the gypsum industry is so small that it simply could not conspire to restrain information b. the case was subject to a per se rule against price fixing, so it was illegal
  c. the gypsum industry, being part of construction, is exempt from antitrust laws d. the gypsum industry is so small information sharing is essential
  e. none of the other choices

Question 2

Before the passage of federal discrimination laws, the labor unions were the only groups that consistently did not engage in discriminatory membership policies.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

[tofugiraffe]

Answer to Question 1

e

Answer to Question 2

FALSE

[oliviahorn72]

Thank you

[tofugiraffe]

No problemo