The courts use the rule of reason to decide many antitrust cases ...

[plus1]

The courts use the rule of reason to decide many antitrust cases because:
 a. the Clayton Act requires a rule of reason analysis be used
  b. it is reasonable to compare a case being tried to a previous case and use the decision from that case c. the courts would rather use the rule of reason than go through a detailed economic analysis
  d. all practices attacked under antitrust laws are anti-competitive and thus prohibited e. none of the other choices

Question 2

The possible remedies that an injured party may sue for under Title VII include:
 a. back pay
  b. punitive damages c. reinstatement
  d. back pay and reinstatement
  e. all of the specific choices are possible

[ebe]

Answer to Question 1

e

Answer to Question 2

e

[plus1]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[mjenn52]

Wow, this really help