Author Question: The Sherman Act expressly holds illegal: a. contracts and combinations in restraint of trade b. ... (Read 86 times)

CQXA · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

The Sherman Act expressly holds illegal:
a. contracts and combinations in restraint of trade
b. discrimination in prices between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality c. a business that raises its prices, where the effect may be to lessen competition
d. contracts and combinations in restraint of trade; discrimination in prices between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality
e. contracts and combinations in restraint of trade; discrimination in prices between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality; and a business that raises its prices, where the effect may be to lessen competition

Question 2

In Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America, L.L.C., where Lewis sued for violation of her Title VII rights, contending that she was fired for not conforming to sex stereotypes and in retaliation for opposing discriminatory practices, the appeals court applied:
a. the four-part framework from the McDonnell-Douglas decision for making a prima facie case b. the four-part framework from the Constitution for making a prima facie case
c. the standard Title VII test for discrimination
d. the two-part framework from the Sullivan-Douglas decision for making a sex discrimination case e. the National Discrimination Standard