Author Question: Prohibiting the introduction of oral evidence when it contradicts the terms of a written contract is ... (Read 92 times)

ARLKQ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Prohibiting the introduction of oral evidence when it contradicts the terms of a written contract is an example of:
 a. the right to disaffirm
  b. the parol evidence rule c. promissory estoppel
  d. a legal detriment
  e. none of the other choices

Question 2

Grievance arbitration clauses are in about 50 of all collective bargaining agreements.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



jesse.fleming

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 301
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

FALSE



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The average person is easily confused by the terms pharmaceutics and pharmacology, thinking they are one and the same. Whereas pharmaceutics is the science of preparing and dispensing drugs (otherwise known as the science of pharmacy), pharmacology is the study of medications.

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

Did you know?

It is believed that humans initially contracted crabs from gorillas about 3 million years ago from either sleeping in gorilla nests or eating the apes.

Did you know?

Your skin wrinkles if you stay in the bathtub a long time because the outermost layer of skin (which consists of dead keratin) swells when it absorbs water. It is tightly attached to the skin below it, so it compensates for the increased area by wrinkling. This happens to the hands and feet because they have the thickest layer of dead keratin cells.

Did you know?

Inotropic therapy does not have a role in the treatment of most heart failure patients. These drugs can make patients feel and function better but usually do not lengthen the predicted length of their lives.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library