Author Question: In Gieseke v. IDCA, Gieseke formed a company to compete with his old employer and worked with one of ... (Read 101 times)

genevieve1028 · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

In Gieseke v. IDCA, Gieseke formed a company to compete with his old employer and worked with one of the former owners of his old employer in the new company. His former employer moved some of the equipment of the new company and changed its mailing address without permission of Gieseke or his partner. When Gieseke sued, the courts held that the former employer was not liable for improper interference as that tort is not recognized in Minnesota.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

To satisfy the Statute of Frauds under UCC Article 2 there must be:
a. a full description of all goods involved in the sale
b. a legal document signed by both parties to the contract and witnessed by a judge c. a verbal agreement
d. a notarized document detailing all details of the sale and contract e. none of the other choices are correct