This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Falsely accusing someone in public of having a serious, sexually-transmitted disease may be ... (Read 141 times)

schs14

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
Falsely accusing someone in public of having a serious, sexually-transmitted disease may be defamation per se.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In Thayer v. Hollinger, the Montana high court held that the seller of property, who retained ownership of adjoining property and shared a common road, had not granted buyers an easement to use trails on the seller's property.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

raili21

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

TRUE




schs14

  • Member
  • Posts: 569
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


tuate

  • Member
  • Posts: 332
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

It is believed that the Incas used anesthesia. Evidence supports the theory that shamans chewed cocoa leaves and drilled holes into the heads of patients (letting evil spirits escape), spitting into the wounds they made. The mixture of cocaine, saliva, and resin numbed the site enough to allow hours of drilling.

Did you know?

Approximately one in four people diagnosed with diabetes will develop foot problems. Of these, about one-third will require lower extremity amputation.

Did you know?

About one in five American adults and teenagers have had a genital herpes infection—and most of them don't know it. People with genital herpes have at least twice the risk of becoming infected with HIV if exposed to it than those people who do not have genital herpes.

Did you know?

The ratio of hydrogen atoms to oxygen in water (H2O) is 2:1.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library