This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: If a defendant in an intentional tort action did not intend to cause harm: a. he could still be ... (Read 107 times)

swpotter12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
If a defendant in an intentional tort action did not intend to cause harm:
 a. he could still be liable because motive is legally distinct from act and intent b. he could still be liable because he was careless
  c. he cannot be held liable because his motive was not to harm the plaintiff
  d. he cannot be held liable because he did not know who would be harmed by his actions e. none of the other choices

Question 2

Which of the following are forms of deeds used in at least some states to promise that a clear title to property is being conveyed:
 a. assurance deeds b. surface deeds
  c. warranty deeds d. interests deeds
  e. all of the other choices



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Sammyo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

c





 

Did you know?

To combat osteoporosis, changes in lifestyle and diet are recommended. At-risk patients should include 1,200 to 1,500 mg of calcium daily either via dietary means or with supplements.

Did you know?

Patients who have been on total parenteral nutrition for more than a few days may need to have foods gradually reintroduced to give the digestive tract time to start working again.

Did you know?

Critical care patients are twice as likely to receive the wrong medication. Of these errors, 20% are life-threatening, and 42% require additional life-sustaining treatments.

Did you know?

Cyanide works by making the human body unable to use oxygen.

Did you know?

Atropine was named after the Greek goddess Atropos, the oldest and ugliest of the three sisters known as the Fates, who controlled the destiny of men.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library