Author Question: In Commonwealth v. Angelo Todesca Corp where Angelo Todesco Corporation was charged with motor ... (Read 73 times)

cdr_15

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
In Commonwealth v. Angelo Todesca Corp where Angelo Todesco Corporation was charged with motor vehicle homicide after an employee accidentally killed a police officer with a dump truck, the Massachusetts supreme court held that:
 a. a corporation may be criminally liable for violation of a traffic statute
  b. a corporation may not be criminally liable for violation of a traffic statute c. an individual may not be criminally liable for violation of a traffic statute d. an individual may not be civilly liable for a violation of a traffic statute
  e. none of the other choices are correct

Question 2

The traditional primary use of the Fifth Amendment's just compensation (takings) clause is to require the government to pay:
 a. for all business records that must be produced for examination b. for property the government takes over
  c. for all reductions in private property value caused by regulations d. its employees a wage consistent with private sector wages
  e. none of the other choices



lorealeza

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 345
Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

b



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The most common childhood diseases include croup, chickenpox, ear infections, flu, pneumonia, ringworm, respiratory syncytial virus, scabies, head lice, and asthma.

Did you know?

Cytomegalovirus affects nearly the same amount of newborns every year as Down syndrome.

Did you know?

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that all women age 65 years of age or older should be screened with bone densitometry.

Did you know?

Amoebae are the simplest type of protozoans, and are characterized by a feeding and dividing trophozoite stage that moves by temporary extensions called pseudopodia or false feet.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library