This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, the traditional common law rule prevented a party who ... (Read 15 times)

mspears3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 586
In Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, the traditional common law rule prevented a party who accepted a completed construction project from later suing the contractor for flaws in construction that caused injury to others. In reviewing such a case, the Washington state high court held that the rule was no longer sensible in modern times because:
 a. contractors no longer sign liability release forms
  b. contractors are no longer considered trustworthy people compared to in earlier years
  c. construction has become complex so landowners cannot be expected to recognize substandard performance d. contractors no longer work directly with landowners
  e. contractors will do substandard work if they are not held accountable even after a project is completed

Question 2

What is common situs picketing?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

kristenb95

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

Picketing by a union of an entire construction site is known as common situs picketing.




mspears3

  • Member
  • Posts: 586
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Excellent


kswal303

  • Member
  • Posts: 316
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

The training of an anesthesiologist typically requires four years of college, 4 years of medical school, 1 year of internship, and 3 years of residency.

Did you know?

People about to have surgery must tell their health care providers about all supplements they take.

Did you know?

It is difficult to obtain enough calcium without consuming milk or other dairy foods.

Did you know?

Everyone has one nostril that is larger than the other.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library