Author Question: In Cockram v. Genesco, an employee sued for: A) defamation and false light invasion of privacy. B) ... (Read 101 times)

Caiter2013 · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

In Cockram v. Genesco, an employee sued for:
A) defamation and false light invasion of privacy.
B) slander.
C) unreasonable suspicion.
D) genetic testing.

Question 2

Ruth, an employee of a private sector company, was found violating company policy which strictly prohibited employees from using drugs or alcohol within company premises. Ruth was referred to the Employee Assistance Program, which she deliberately refused. This act most likely resulted in:
A) demotion.
B) termination.
C) litigation.
D) suspension pending drug test results.