This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why have some courts been reluctant to adopt the tort of intentional infliction of emotional ... (Read 132 times)

Shelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 582
Why have some courts been reluctant to adopt the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress?

Question 2

How does the court recognize qualified privilege?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Jossy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
Answer to Question 1

Courts have been concerned that in the absence of physical injury, plaintiffs can readily fake emotional distress and win undeserved verdicts, and, hence, have been reluctant to adopt this tort.

Answer to Question 2

The law generally recognizes a qualified privilege where one person communicates with another who has a legitimate need to know the information.




Shelles

  • Member
  • Posts: 582
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


carlsona147

  • Member
  • Posts: 341
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

The word drug comes from the Dutch word droog (meaning "dry"). For centuries, most drugs came from dried plants, hence the name.

Did you know?

Patients who have been on total parenteral nutrition for more than a few days may need to have foods gradually reintroduced to give the digestive tract time to start working again.

Did you know?

During pregnancy, a woman is more likely to experience bleeding gums and nosebleeds caused by hormonal changes that increase blood flow to the mouth and nose.

Did you know?

Everyone has one nostril that is larger than the other.

Did you know?

In the United States, there is a birth every 8 seconds, according to the U.S. Census Bureau's Population Clock.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library