Why do courts generally use an objective standard in analyzing ...

[xclash]

Why do courts generally use an objective standard in analyzing contractual situations instead of a subjective standard?

Question 2

Lingering apparent authority results from:
 A) the failure to give notice of termination.
 B) ratification.
 C) the lack of capacity on the part of the principal.
 D) None of the above

[xiazhe]

Answer to Question 1

When a court is examining a contract, the totality of the circumstances is explored. The objective view, such as what was said, what was written, and how someone acted, typically can be determined; why someone did as he or she did - the subjective standard - may never be detected or known. Courts seek as much certainty as they can get to make their decision.

Answer to Question 2

A

[xclash]

TYSM

[amit]

Gracias!