In a column in the New York Times, a writer referred to a U.S. ...

[audragclark]

In a column in the New York Times, a writer referred to a U.S. senator as a sleazy operative. Assuming the statement is not true, which of the following statements is correct?
 A) The writer and the paper have made a statement that qualifies for recovery under defamation.
 B) The statement does not qualify as a basis for a defamation suit.
 C) There can be no defamation suit because the senator is a public figure.
 D) The statement is defamatory per se.

Question 2

Maximum price requirements:
 A) do not constitute antitrust violations because of the benefits to consumers.
 B) only affect the amount sold and not the competition; and there is no antitrust violation.
 C) constitute resale price maintenance.
 D) None of the above

[chevyboi1976]

Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

C

[audragclark]

Gracias!

[ryansturges]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it