This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Workers' compensation statutes provide the exclusive remedy for employees who are covered by such ... (Read 58 times)

Mr.Thesaxman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
Workers' compensation statutes provide the exclusive remedy for employees who are covered by such statutes and who suffer job-related injuries.
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

One hundred forty-three residents of the Barnegat Pines Development area in Lacey Township, Ocean County, New Jersey, brought suit against Exxon Corporation and Richard E. and Susan M. Ritchie, who did business operating a gasoline station known as Lacey Exxon. The residents brought suit in nuisance, trespass, and under various environmental laws alleging that gasoline from Rule's service station, which had operated between 1959 and 1975 as a Texaco Station, had seeped into the groundwater and contaminated their wells. The residents had an expert witness, Albert D. Young, a consultant in petroleum distribution and a retired Exxon employee, who had 35 years of experience in overseeing, viewing, and evaluating the distribution, storage, and retail sale of gasoline. Young testified that the complaint of suspected gasoline contamination of wells in the present case was typical of the kind of situation he had frequently investigated. According to Young, the service station probably spilled gasoline more frequently than not between 1959 and 1975 and the spilled gasoline would have seeped to the groundwater. Young's opinion was based on his knowledge that such discharges were routine occurrences in probably all 200,000 service stations ever in existence. Also, after considering the results of soil gas studies showing the presence of petroleum vapors in the soil of the old tank field at the station, Young found it more probable than not that spills would have occurred during deliveries in the pre-1975 period because when tank sizes failed to keep pace with truck capacities, overfills were routine at all stations. Such spills could have gone undetected by the station owner. The jury returned a verdict of no liability in favor of both the Ritchies and Exxon. Was the jury's verdict correct? What case law could the appellate court apply in making its decision?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

sultansheikh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

We agree with plaintiffs that as area residents, they comprised a foreseeable class potentially harmed by any negligent discharge from the gas station, although the harm actually caused by the redlining per se was apparently minimal. Also, plaintiffs did present evidence attributing the well contamination found in some wells to the Rule/Texaco era, and it was the measured contamination, that in turn prompted the redlining. In our view, the nuisance claim against Rule could have been sustained by legitimate inferences from the evidence. We therefore reverse the dismissal of the nuisance claims and remand for further proceedings. Bahrle v. Exxon Corp., 652 A.2d 178 (N.J. Super. 1995).




Mr.Thesaxman

  • Member
  • Posts: 514
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Wow, this really help


Liddy

  • Member
  • Posts: 342
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

The highest suicide rate in the United States is among people ages 65 years and older. Almost 15% of people in this age group commit suicide every year.

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions cause a higher risk of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Did you know?

According to research, pregnant women tend to eat more if carrying a baby boy. Male fetuses may secrete a chemical that stimulates their mothers to step up her energy intake.

Did you know?

Many supplement containers do not even contain what their labels say. There are many documented reports of products containing much less, or more, that what is listed on their labels. They may also contain undisclosed prescription drugs and even contaminants.

Did you know?

Parkinson's disease is both chronic and progressive. This means that it persists over a long period of time and that its symptoms grow worse over time.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library