This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The doctrine of strict liability can make the manufacturer of a dangerously defective product ... (Read 133 times)

futuristic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 638
The doctrine of strict liability can make the manufacturer of a dangerously defective product liable, even if there's no proof of negligence.
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In a benefit-detriment approach, consideration is a benefit received by the promisee.
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

chem1s3

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

FALSE




futuristic

  • Member
  • Posts: 638
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


triiciiaa

  • Member
  • Posts: 349
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Anti-aging claims should not ever be believed. There is no supplement, medication, or any other substance that has been proven to slow or stop the aging process.

Did you know?

Long-term mental and physical effects from substance abuse include: paranoia, psychosis, immune deficiencies, and organ damage.

Did you know?

As many as 20% of Americans have been infected by the fungus known as Histoplasmosis. While most people are asymptomatic or only have slight symptoms, infection can progress to a rapid and potentially fatal superinfection.

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library