Author Question: In the Hartford Fire Insurance Co case, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that it could not assert ... (Read 36 times)

lunatika · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

In the Hartford Fire Insurance Co case, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that it could not assert jurisdiction over European companies in competition matters unless the companies had a direct physical presence in a U.S. state.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

John Harrington operates a business that almost always hires skilled workers who are college graduates; currently, however, his business does have a part-time opening for an unskilled worker. Harrington is considering hiring an uneducated welfare recipient instead of a student from the local university. Apply the Guidelines for Analyzing a Contemplated Action to this problem.

jamesnevil303 · **Reply #1 on:** Jun 24, 2018

Answer to Question 1

FALSE

Answer to Question 2

From the decision-maker's point of view, there is greater risk in hiring an uneducated welfare recipient instead of a college student. If an uneducated welfare recipient is hired, there may be disruption in the workplace resulting from skilled, educated employees working with an unfamiliar type of co-worker. The value of hiring an uneducated welfare recipient is twofold: First, there may be a greater likelihood of assisting someone with a family (i.e., more individuals would benefit); and, second, the firm would further the current governmental and societal initiative to move individuals from Welfare to Work.