This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: An elevated reticulocyte count rules out which of the following? a. Acute blood loss b. ... (Read 79 times)

mpobi80

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 519
An elevated reticulocyte count rules out which of the following?
 
  a. Acute blood loss
  b. Aplastic crisis
  c. Acute hemolysis
  d. Successful patient response to iron therapy

Question 2

Which of the following is the most specific indicator of accelerated intravascular red cell destruction?
 
  a. Increased serum bilirubin
  b. Increased haptoglobin
  c. Decreased hematocrit
  d. Decreased haptoglobin



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ally

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Answer to Question 1

ANS: B
An elevated reticulocyte count is seen after acute blood loss, acute hemolysis, and after successful patient response to iron therapy. It is not observed in an aplastic crisis.

Answer to Question 2

ANS: D
When red cells are destroyed in the circulation, hemoglobin is released into plasma. Haptoglobin binds the free hemoglobin and thus decreases in plasma. This is specific for intravascular hemolysis.




mpobi80

  • Member
  • Posts: 519
Reply 2 on: Jun 25, 2018
Gracias!


Zebsrer

  • Member
  • Posts: 284
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

Bacteria have been found alive in a lake buried one half mile under ice in Antarctica.

Did you know?

Approximately one in three babies in the United States is now delivered by cesarean section. The number of cesarean sections in the United States has risen 46% since 1996.

Did you know?

The human body produces and destroys 15 million blood cells every second.

Did you know?

More than 150,000 Americans killed by cardiovascular disease are younger than the age of 65 years.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library