This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which one of the following would not be grounds for revocation of licensure? Breach of contract ... (Read 143 times)

DyllonKazuo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 565
Which one of the following would not be grounds for revocation of licensure?
 
 Breach of contract
  Conviction of slander
  HIV positive
  Misdemeanor violation

Question 2

The principle that the provider has a professional obligation to care for a patient is known as
 
 direct causation
  duty
  dereliction of duty
  damage



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Chelseyj.hasty

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Answer to Question 1

HIV positive

Rationale: Being HIV positive would not be grounds for revocation of licensure. All other options could be considered grounds for revocation of licensure.

Answer to Question 2

duty

Rationale: Failure to use due care in the line of duty or dereliction of duty can result in direct causation of a patient's illness or damage to a patient's health.




DyllonKazuo

  • Member
  • Posts: 565
Reply 2 on: Jun 25, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


mammy1697

  • Member
  • Posts: 341
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

Disorders that may affect pharmacodynamics include genetic mutations, malnutrition, thyrotoxicosis, myasthenia gravis, Parkinson's disease, and certain forms of insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus.

Did you know?

Human neurons are so small that they require a microscope in order to be seen. However, some neurons can be up to 3 feet long, such as those that extend from the spinal cord to the toes.

Did you know?

Vampire bats have a natural anticoagulant in their saliva that permits continuous bleeding after they painlessly open a wound with their incisors. This capillary blood does not cause any significant blood loss to their victims.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

Did you know?

The first-known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used in Egypt in 2000 BC. Condoms were also reportedly used, made of animal bladders or intestines.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library