Do you believe that it would be ethical for people to enhance their bodies using new technologies? If so, do you believe that such enhancement should be available to all, or only to those who could pay for it? If the former, how would you justify requiring some persons to pay for the enhancement of others? If the latter, how would you address the concerns about socila equity that such a market-based approach might give rise to?
What will be an ideal response?
Question 2Do you believe that the view of the relationship between authority and order offered by Sunstein in his article in this volume contradicts Taylors view of the usefulness of State surveillance? Why, or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
Faith Ringgold, God Bless America, No. 13 from the series American People.
Of four outcomes people can have after exposure to trauma, the most prevalent is resilience. Others, ...
How People Match Their Goals to Their Means
Democracy (or “democratization”) is a global social movement. People all over the world yearn ...
The energy set-point view that is the basis of many people’s thinking about hunger and eating.
People using walkers typically have a high level of mobility impairment.