This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What are the purported dangers of human cloning? What will be an ideal ... (Read 43 times)

scienceeasy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 565
What are the purported dangers of human cloning?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Proponents of human cloning offer a variety of reasons for favoring it, all of them
  involving purported human benefits.


 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

epscape

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
Answer to Question 1

How serious are they? Are they
strong enough to support either banning or restricting the process?



Answer to Question 2

Which of these benefits make the strongest case
for permitting cloning? Which make the weakest case?





scienceeasy

  • Member
  • Posts: 565
Reply 2 on: Jun 19, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


cassie_ragen

  • Member
  • Posts: 347
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

According to the FDA, adverse drug events harmed or killed approximately 1,200,000 people in the United States in the year 2015.

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).

Did you know?

Stroke kills people from all ethnic backgrounds, but the people at highest risk for fatal strokes are: black men, black women, Asian men, white men, and white women.

Did you know?

The term bacteria was devised in the 19th century by German biologist Ferdinand Cohn. He based it on the Greek word "bakterion" meaning a small rod or staff. Cohn is considered to be the father of modern bacteriology.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library