Why should I pay more in insurance so that women like Sandra ...

[curlz]

Do you even know what Sandra fluke was really talking about?
Or do you believe anything Limburger says?
He neglected to mention that Sandra was testifying about her friend who was denied birth control she needed it in order to stop ovarian cysts from growing.
NOT his Viagra fueled perverted thoughts.

[formula1]

Ha! I agree with you for once! Why would should you and your right hand pay for me going out and getting laid!!!

[coco]

You shouldn't.  And by the way,  there is no evidence of any kind that Sandra Fluke has ever had sex of ANY kind, save the insane ravings of one completely unqualified, lying fool on "hate radio".

Let me guess:  you didn't review her testimony, either, right?

Neo-nazi Americans need to know their emperor has no clothes, and doesn't do his homework, either.

This whole ridiculous fake controversy begins and ends with a lying, lazy slob who has a radio show and who is such a pontificating clown that he spewed his madness for nine hours on this rather small insurance matter, having never read or heard a word of her testimony.

The issue is not Sandra Fluke.  Indeed, there really is no issue related to her heroic testimony, about a friend with a horrible malignant disease.  The issue is about a liar and con man who thinks so little of his brainwashed adherents that he gives them insane talking points, based on nothing but his own laziness and insanity.    

She discussed hormone and other therapies and medical requirements for her 23-year-old friend.   Not even a nuance of sexual conduct was involved, and indeed, most females so suffering inherently CANNOT have ordinary sexual intercourse.

All the political smoke and mirrors spinning off this is balderdash.    

What we now know to a empirical  certainty is this: Limbaugh is not reliable or rational on ANY subject, and is too lazy to even background himself in the facts, even simple matters of witness testimony any schlub can look up.

Democrats?  Republicans?    It's about sanity, and the "Bard of Lard" is unarmed in this confrontation.

[Hungry!]

Your rant is entirely unrelated to what was actually said.  You might want to read her testimony, which had almost nothing to do with birth control, and nothing to do with sex, and almost nothing to do with her.

You won't.

But please examine SOME of the facts before spewing demented nonsense, from a source like Limbaugh, who is entirely specious, corrupt, and too lazy to even once refer in his nine-hour hatefest to anything that was actually said.

Drawing impressions and opinions from a paid professional liar and con man is not a particularly good way to be accurate, relevant,  or anything much but strange.

Limbaugh's psychotic, drug-induced fantasies are not relevant to this rather small insurance issue.

And Fluke never said anything about "sleeping around".  That is terribly wrong.