This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Johnson and Powers explicitly deny that moral evaluation is: a. Zero sum c. Applicable to agents ... (Read 144 times)

ereecah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Johnson and Powers explicitly deny that moral evaluation is:
 
 

a. Zero sum c. Applicable to agents
  b. Cumulative d. Applicable to actions



Question 2

How is the functionality of artifacts often framed?
 
 

a. In terms of teleological explanation c. In terms of cosmological explanation
  b. In terms of deontological explanation d. In terms of ontological explanation




Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

nicoleclaire22

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

ANS: A
Johnson and Powers deny that moral evaluation is zero sum.



Answer to Question 2

ANS: A
The functionality of artifacts is often framed in terms of teleological explanation.





ereecah

  • Member
  • Posts: 530
Reply 2 on: Jun 19, 2018
Wow, this really help


EAN94

  • Member
  • Posts: 307
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Though the United States has largely rejected the metric system, it is used for currency, as in 100 pennies = 1 dollar. Previously, the British currency system was used, with measurements such as 12 pence to the shilling, and 20 shillings to the pound.

Did you know?

By definition, when a medication is administered intravenously, its bioavailability is 100%.

Did you know?

The human body produces and destroys 15 million blood cells every second.

Did you know?

Parkinson's disease is both chronic and progressive. This means that it persists over a long period of time and that its symptoms grow worse over time.

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library