On what grounds do Lomasky and Brennan reject the ...

[sammy]

On what grounds do Lomasky and Brennan reject the consequentialist case for a
  duty to vote?

 
 

a. It assumes, incorrectly, that voters are informed voters.
  b. It hinges on the claim that there are matters of huge moment at stake.
  c. It is based on a biased understanding of the nature of representative
  democracy.
  d. All of the above

Question 2

Which of the following is not an argument considered and rejected by Lomasky
  and Brennan

 
 

a. Argument from Prudence
  b. Argument from Beneficence
  c. Argument from Expressive Ethics
  d. Argument from Act Utilitarianism

[ryansturges]

Answer to Question 1

ANS: B

Answer to Question 2

ANS: B

[sammy]

Excellent

[alexanderhamilton]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it