Author Question: Can someone be both a consequentialist and a utilitarian? Explain your answer. What will be an ... (Read 62 times)

JGIBBSON

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
Can someone be both a consequentialist and a utilitarian? Explain your answer.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Define axiology.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



randomguy133

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Answer to Question 1

ANS:
Yes, someone can be both a consequentialist and a utilitarian. In fact, anyone who is a utilitarian must be a consequentialist, since utilitarianism is one version of consequentialism. (Other consequentialist theories mentioned in this chapter are egoism and altruism.) A consequentialist is anyone who believes that the rightness or wrongness of an action depends upon its consequences. A utilitarian is a consequentialist who believes that we should act so as to produce the best consequences for everyone, ourselves included.



Answer to Question 2

ANS:
Axiology is the study of values, such as value in human behavior (ethics) and value in art (aesthetics).




Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Limit intake of red meat and dairy products made with whole milk. Choose skim milk, low-fat or fat-free dairy products. Limit fried food. Use healthy oils when cooking.

Did you know?

Fewer than 10% of babies are born on their exact due dates, 50% are born within 1 week of the due date, and 90% are born within 2 weeks of the date.

Did you know?

The oldest recorded age was 122. Madame Jeanne Calment was born in France in 1875 and died in 1997. She was a vegetarian and loved olive oil, port wine, and chocolate.

Did you know?

The calories found in one piece of cherry cheesecake could light a 60-watt light bulb for 1.5 hours.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library