In the case of Tarosoff v. The Regents of the University of ...

[roselinechinyere27m]

In the case of Tarosoff v. The Regents of the University of California (1976), the court said that health care providers have a duty to breach confidentiality when:
 
  a. a mentally ill person has a history of violence
  b. a client, with a psychiatric diagnosis that carries any risk of harm to others, returns to his or her family
  c. a client tells the health care provider that he or she is going to harm anyone who mistreats him or her
  d. a client makes a specific threat to an identifiable person

Question 2

List the food groups as they appear on the food pyramid.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

[jlaineee]

Answer to Question 1

D

Feedback
A Incorrect. The case of Tarosoff v. The Regents of the University of California (1976) involved a patient, but the case does not require breach of confidentiality for a mentally ill person with a history of violence.
B Incorrect. The case of Tarosoff v. The Regents of the University of California (1976) involved a patient, but the case does not require breach of confidentiality for a client with a psychiatric diagnosis that carries any risk of harm to others.
C Incorrect. The case of Tarosoff v. The Regents of the University of California (1976) involved a patient, but the case does not require breach of confidentiality for a client with nonspecific claims to harm others who may mistreat them.
D Correct. The duty to breach confidentiality by warning a third party is required only when there is a specific threat to an identifiable person.

Answer to Question 2

Fruits
Vegetables
Grains
Meats/beans
Milk
Oils

[roselinechinyere27m]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[dreamfighter72]

Gracias!