Answer to Question 1
2
Rationale:
1. The child would need to have more than just a beginning competence to nullify the parents' authority.
2. Parents and guardians have absolute authority to make choices about their child's health care except in these cases:
When the child and parents do not agree on major treatment options
When the parents' choice of treatment does not permit life-saving treatment for the child
When there is a potential conflict of interest between the child and parents, such as with suspected child abuse or neglect
3. Understanding concrete operations is a start, but is not enough to nullify the parents' authority.
4. Being a mature minor does not eliminate the need to obtain the parents' informed consent, as they still maintain authority over their child.
Answer to Question 2
4
Rationale:
1. Honoring her request is not correct, because the nurse has a professional duty to explain that the mother's belief about immunizations is erroneous, and could result in harm to her infant.
2. Explaining that antibodies can fight many diseases is not correct, because the body makes antibodies that are specific to antigens of each disease. Antibodies for one disease cannot fight another disease.
3. Telling her that not immunizing her infant might protect pregnant women is not correct, because immunizing the infant with MMR vaccine will help protect pregnant women from contracting rubella by decreasing the transmission. If a pregnant woman contracts rubella, her fetus can be severely damaged with congenital rubella syndrome.
4. Explaining that if her child contracts measles, mumps, or rubella, he could have very serious and permanent complications from these diseases is correct because measles, mumps, and rubella all have potentially serious sequelae, such as encephalitis, brain damage, and deafness.