Author Question: Zach Greinke's marginal product as a baseball player would be about the same as a Los Angeles Dodger ... (Read 33 times)

Pineappleeh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 585
Zach Greinke's marginal product as a baseball player would be about the same as a Los Angeles Dodger and a Kansas City Royal. Why were the Dodgers willing to pay Greinke a higher salary than he was paid as a Royal?
 
  A) The Dodgers needed a superstar to attract fans to their games. The Royals had no need to attract fans to their games.
  B) The owner of the Dodgers was under more pressure from the fans and the Los Angeles media to pay Greinke a higher salary than the Royals were willing to pay.
  C) The Dodgers play more home games than the Royals. As a result, the Dodgers earn more revenue from ticket sales that they can use to pay player salaries.
  D) Greinke's marginal revenue product is higher as a Dodger than it was as a Royal.

Question 2

If, in a closed economy, real GDP is 30 billion, consumption is 20 billion, and government purchases are 5 billion, what is total saving in the economy?
 
  A) 5 billion B) 15 billion C) 45 billion D) 55 billion


al

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

A



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

About 100 new prescription or over-the-counter drugs come into the U.S. market every year.

Did you know?

The most common childhood diseases include croup, chickenpox, ear infections, flu, pneumonia, ringworm, respiratory syncytial virus, scabies, head lice, and asthma.

Did you know?

According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, lung disease is the third leading killer in the United States, responsible for one in seven deaths. It is the leading cause of death among infants under the age of one year.

Did you know?

According to animal studies, the typical American diet is damaging to the liver and may result in allergies, low energy, digestive problems, and a lack of ability to detoxify harmful substances.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library