This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Provide an economic explanation for why government subsidization of child immunizations may lead to ... (Read 27 times)

awywial

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Provide an economic explanation for why government subsidization of child immunizations may lead to a more efficient outcome.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Refer to Figure 4-1. If the market price is 3.50, what is the maximum number of ice cream cones that Kendra will buy?
 
  A) 1 B) 2 C) 3 D) 4



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Mholman93

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

Child immunizations may have positive externalities as they keep disease from spreading. Therefore, a subsidy which would lower the price of the immunizations would encourage more families to get them. This would push the quantity up toward the efficient level.

Answer to Question 2

A




awywial

  • Member
  • Posts: 577
Reply 2 on: Jun 29, 2018
Excellent


robbielu01

  • Member
  • Posts: 336
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

Patients who have undergone chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer often complain of a lack of mental focus; memory loss; and a general diminution in abilities such as multitasking, attention span, and general mental agility.

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

About 3.2 billion people, nearly half the world population, are at risk for malaria. In 2015, there are about 214 million malaria cases and an estimated 438,000 malaria deaths.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library