This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In the figure above, the allocatively efficient output of computers is A) 2 million per year. B) ... (Read 83 times)

P68T

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
In the figure above, the allocatively efficient output of computers is
 
  A) 2 million per year.
  B) 3 million per year.
  C) 4 million per year.
  D) the largest amount possible.

Question 2

In a short-run macroeconomic equilibrium, potential GDP exceeds real GDP. If aggregate demand does not change, then the
 
  A) short-run aggregate supply curve will shift rightward as the money wage rate falls.
  B) short-run aggregate supply curve will shift leftward as the money wage rate rises.
  C) long-run aggregate supply curve will shift leftward as the money wage rate rises.
  D) long-run aggregate supply curve will shift leftward as the money wage rate falls.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

johnpizzaz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 345
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

A




P68T

  • Member
  • Posts: 509
Reply 2 on: Jun 29, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


nothere

  • Member
  • Posts: 324
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

Excessive alcohol use costs the country approximately $235 billion every year.

Did you know?

The most destructive flu epidemic of all times in recorded history occurred in 1918, with approximately 20 million deaths worldwide.

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

Human kidneys will clean about 1 million gallons of blood in an average lifetime.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library