Author Question: In the Steve Titus case, which of the following is true? A. Titus, the sole witness in the case, ... (Read 53 times)

futuristic · **on:** Jun 19, 2018

In the Steve Titus case, which of the following is true?

A. Titus, the sole witness in the case, identified the attacker of his fianc.
B. Titus was charged with a crime but the prosecution failed because there were no eyewitnesses.
C. An innocent man had previously been convicted of a crime. The real perpetrator, Steve Titus, was found only after an eyewitness identified him.
D. Steve Titus, an innocent man, was convicted based on a faulty lineup.

Question 2

In Gilbert v. California, 1967 and United States v Wade, 1967 the court ruled

A. that the use of improper lineup procedures violated a defendant's constitutional rights.
B. that the defendant had a right to a defense attorney during a lineup.
C. that the lineup methods used in both cases was constitutional.
D. that lineups must involve only one eyewitness at a time.