This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following in NOT a reason why police should be cautious in enlisting a psychologist to ... (Read 16 times)

geodog55

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Which of the following in NOT a reason why police should be cautious in enlisting a psychologist to assist in hostage negotiation?
 
  A. Psychologists have little formal training on the topic
  B. Predictors of probable dangerousness in a given person are very poor
  C. Psychologists may side with the hostage taker, reflecting the Stockholm syndrome
  D. Statistical methods are more accurate predictors of outcome than is clinical judgment

Question 2

What is NOT one of the good signs for hostage negotiations identified? by Greenstone?
 
  A. the hostage taker talking more in general.
  B. the hostage taker talking about similarities to the negotiator.
  C. the hostage taker talking more about their personal life.
  D. the hostage taker reflecting less violence in conversation.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

taylorsonier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

B




geodog55

  • Member
  • Posts: 530
Reply 2 on: Jun 19, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


yeungji

  • Member
  • Posts: 319
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Street names for barbiturates include reds, red devils, yellow jackets, blue heavens, Christmas trees, and rainbows. They are commonly referred to as downers.

Did you know?

The first oncogene was discovered in 1970 and was termed SRC (pronounced "SARK").

Did you know?

Drug-induced pharmacodynamic effects manifested in older adults include drug-induced renal toxicity, which can be a major factor when these adults are experiencing other kidney problems.

Did you know?

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood disease in the world. Most children who develop asthma have symptoms before they are 5 years old.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library