Why is Muller v. Oregon (1908) considered a landmark case? A. ...

[Alainaaa8]

Why is Muller v. Oregon (1908) considered a landmark case?
 
  A. Its acceptance of social-science evidence rather than law cases and statutes
 B. Its clarification of the insanity defense
  C. Its emphasis on victim impact statements
  D. Its refusal to allow expert testimony

Question 2

Which is NOT a criticism leveled against psychology when applied to the legal system?
 
  A. The lack of ecological validity in much psychological research
  B. Going beyond research data to make moral judgments
  C. The use of irrelevant past cases in making decisions about current issues
  D. Its intrusion upon, and possible subversion of, legitimate activities of the legal system

[bblaney]

Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

C

[Alainaaa8]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[hramirez205]

Excellent