This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Of the two economic growth theories, which is the most optimistic about the chances of real GDP per ... (Read 80 times)

shenderson6

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Of the two economic growth theories, which is the most optimistic about the chances of real GDP per person growing indefinitely? Which is the most pessimistic? What accounts for the differences?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Inflation is known as a ________ because it ________.
 
  A) tax; redistributes goods and services from households and businesses to the government
  B) revenue; is the only source of business income for the government
  C) good thing; keeps the value of goods and services increasing
  D) bad thing; allows people to obtain the wrong kind of wealth
  E) tax; redistributes goods and services from the government to households and businesses



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

milbourne11

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 322
Answer to Question 1

The most optimistic is the new growth theory, which concludes that real GDP per person can continue to grow indefinitely. The most pessimistic is the classical theory, which concludes that growth in real GDP per person will stop and that people will produce only the subsistence level of real GDP per person. The difference in the two conclusions can be traced to differences in assumptions in three key areas. First, the new growth theory concludes that technology will advance forever because people, seeking profit, make decisions to develop new technology. Classical growth theory assumes that technological advances are rare and infrequent. Second, the new growth theory assumes that the economy is not subject to diminishing returns. Hence, as the economy accumulates more capital, the returns to capital do not diminish and so the incentive to add yet more capital continues undiminished. The classical growth theory assumes that capital (and labor) is subject to diminishing returns. Thus as more capital is accumulated, the returns diminish, and so the incentive to continue adding more capital disappears. Thus the capital stock eventually stops growing. Finally, the new growth theory assumes that the population does not grow more rapidly as real GDP per person increases. The classical theory assumes that whenever real GDP per person exceeds the subsistence level, rapid population growth occurs and, because of diminishing returns to labor, the increased population drives the level of real GDP back to the subsistence amount.

Answer to Question 2

A




shenderson6

  • Member
  • Posts: 573
Reply 2 on: Jun 29, 2018
Gracias!


TheDev123

  • Member
  • Posts: 332
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

There are approximately 3 million unintended pregnancies in the United States each year.

Did you know?

Sperm cells are so tiny that 400 to 500 million (400,000,000–500,000,000) of them fit onto 1 tsp.

Did you know?

Long-term mental and physical effects from substance abuse include: paranoia, psychosis, immune deficiencies, and organ damage.

Did you know?

In the ancient and medieval periods, dysentery killed about ? of all babies before they reach 12 months of age. The disease was transferred through contaminated drinking water, because there was no way to adequately dispose of sewage, which contaminated the water.

Did you know?

Critical care patients are twice as likely to receive the wrong medication. Of these errors, 20% are life-threatening, and 42% require additional life-sustaining treatments.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library